Strategies for Disseminating EBP

Strategies for Disseminating EBP


Dissemination Strategies

RMAT WITH IN-TEXT CITATIONS 250-280 WORDS Developing a Culture of In this Discussion, you will explore strategies for disseminating EBP within your organization, community, or industry.Evidence-Based PracticeIn this Discussion, you will explore strategies for disseminating EBP within your organization, community, or industry.

APA FORMAT WITH IN-TEXT CITATIONS 250-280 WORDS at least 3 references.

To Prepare: Disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.

This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.

1. Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP(evidenced based practice)

2. Post at two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. 

3. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. 

4. Identify at two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. 

5. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified.

Be specific and provide examples.

Background and Objectives for the Systematic Review

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Effective Healthcare (EHC) Program funds individual researchers, research centers, and academic organizations to work with AHRQ to produce effectiveness and comparative effectiveness research for clinicians and consumers.1 Comparative effectiveness research (CER) compares the benefits, harms, and effectiveness of health interventions for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of clinical conditions and the improvement of health care delivery. The purpose of CER is to assist patients and consumers, clinicians and other providers, and purchasers and payers to make informed decisions that will improve health care at both the individual and population levels.1

One EHC goal is to make CER accessible to these decisionmakers. The Institute of Medicine’s list of 100 priority topics for CER highlights the importance of translating and disseminating this research.2 The specific topic (“compare the effectiveness of dissemination and translation techniques to facilitate the use of CER by patients, clinicians, payers, and others”) was listed among the first quartile of topics recommended for initial focus. Many hope that better communication and dissemination of CER will result in more widespread use of such information.

Coupled with these mandates is the fact that the ad hoc Uncertainty Committee of the EHC Stakeholder Group is interested in promoting effective ways to communicate uncertainty about health and health care evidence to end-users. The committee would like to know what approaches to conveying uncertainty increase the likelihood that audiences receiving such information will understand it and be able to factor it into their decisionmaking.

This systematic review has three related components; all focus on promoting informed health and health care decisions among patients and providers. First, it addresses the comparative effectiveness of communicating the evidence in various contents and formats that increases the likelihood that it will be understood and used by the target audience. Second, it examines the comparative effectiveness of a variety of approaches for disseminating the evidence from those who develop it to its potential users. Third, it examines the comparative effectiveness of various ways of communicating uncertainty associated with health and health care evidence to different target audiences.

Permalink: ‎

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
Open chat
Hello, how may I be of help?
Hello, how may I be of help?